My wife, Savannah, and I were having dinner with some friends the other night and I began asking them questions about music in the church. Like me, he plays guitar at his church and, like Savannah, she has heard a lot of Christian music because of his role at the church. The conversation was foggy with mixed opinions. How is music used in the church today?
As we talked, I realized something much deeper running under the surface about friendship and music. You see, Savannah and I have friends we are able to come to with concerns, thoughts, and struggles and can expect a true dialogue about it. There is a mutual respect and shared care for each other. We can hang out with no agendas. We can walk into each other’s messy houses. All of which is adding scenes to our journey with this other couple.
As I reflected on this relationship, I became aware that this is rare for my generation. You walk into a coffee shop — once a place for people to come together — and everyone has built their own island: laptop, earbuds, and drink. Or even worse, you meet a friend for coffee and you find he looks at their phone more than you. We hide from vulnerability through a peculiar dissatisfaction with what we are immediately confronted.
So what does this have to do with music in the church? My generation is enchanted with experience. Experience is passive in that it describes a time where you are effected without having the responsibility to reciprocate. A roller coaster is an experience. Walking into an Apple Store is an experience. Checking your twitter feed is an experience. There is nothing bad about having experiences until it comes into arenas it should never enter. Because the nature of experience is that it never confronts you or asks something of you — there is no need for response. It is self-centered.
This is what has happen to music written for the church. We advertise “worship experiences” not even realizing that those two terms are exclusive. Worship is interaction. It is a response in our dialogue with God. It is not a time for God to act upon us, but a chance for us to corporately answer to His gestures of love, grace, and mercy in our lives. When worship is through the medium of music we have a unique opportunity to creatively transcend mere words and to convey these longings of our hearts. We do experience emotions during musical worship, but not because we are being swept away by musical crescendos and repetitive chorus. For a moment, we have an entire congregation joining in one voice in a creative, transcendent dialogue with our Creator. Such unity, selflessness, and honesty should stir emotions.
And this is the great responsibility of the songwriters in the church. They are to continue the dialogue. Each song should add something to the conversation. And the church needs to demand this from its artists: “Wait, didn’t we sing almost the exact same lyric in your last single?” What would our friends think if Savannah and I just continued to try and have the same conversation with them every week? In the worship “hits” of today I find less dialogue and progression in music and more formulaic production and falling back on cliche phrases. Is this all creative image bearers of the boldest Creator can muster up? No, I don’t think songwriters are giving enough credit to themselves or the church. But if the church and the artists continue to let experience drive the arts it will never go anywhere beyond having to effect people’s emotions and passions. The music within the church has become an opiate for the masses instead of a chance to join together in proclamation and dialogue with God.
But we can learn a lot about our dialog with God from our everyday lives. Savannah and I are blessed to have friends who we can dialog with regularly. We do not hang out with them because we need the experience of being with friends. We hang out with them because they reveal new aspects of our lives to us, and we to them. We form each other into better people. At every meeting we are all engaged with each other in respect and love. Now how can we capture this respect and beauty in our dialog with God?


Now how can we capture this respect and beauty in our dialog with God?
Maybe we need more musical prayer/jam sessions.
I’m very glad you wrote this. It speaks to what a lot of people are thinking, but maybe afraid to say out loud. How do we articulate to each other, or to the band leader, that hearing the same chords and lyrics over and over begins to feel trite or insincere?
More than once have I walked into a worship service thinking, “Haven’t I heard this exact scene before? And before?” It would be a tragedy for the genre to be forever known as mainly being one, often-tacky sound.
Interestingly, I recently heard from a Catholic friend about Protestant worship music. While she’s not knocking it as a whole, she feels its not appropriate during church, as the lyrics spend a lot of time talking about ‘us’ and not God. How God makes us feel, but not necessarily about His Greatness. She’s one of many in the camp that feel Christian music is fine on the radio waves, music within the church should remain ancient and traditional.
It’s an interesting conversation worth having, to be sure!
Christina,
As a guitar player I’m all about more jam sessions
But you are right in asking where we need to go from here to face this issue. In my limited role at my church I try to offer up new song ideas and even songs I write as a way to broaden the circle we are creating. And I think that is where it needs to begin; broadening the horizon instead of trying to make a paradigm shift. This way, the congregation will see what else is out there and hopefully run with it!
Your friend is on to something too. I do not agree that it must be ancient but she is right in that it needs to be more transcendant. I encourage you to have this conversation both here and with your friends!
I agree that church music has that capability to affect both the reason center as well as the heart. I totally get that music is worship. I also agree that there are Christian songwriters who aren’t particularly skilled, but then that is true in any area of the arts. I wouldn’t personally discount what they wrote just because it isn’t as eloquent, because they may be totally sincere but less gifted. I think there are some great writers out there today like Chris Tomlin and Laura Story, for example. Story recently won a well-deserved Grammy for her song “Blessings.” She has the quality AND got recognized for it which helped give publicity to a message of love that more people will hear.
Mandy,
Thanks for the comment! I agree with you that we shouldn’t discount anyone for lack of eloquence or giftedness on an occasion or two. That is one reason I didn’t want to mention any names or songs. But, as a whole, there should be a standard that encourages eloquence and quality from our gifted brethren. No different than we would expect a preacher to be eloquent and bring depth. I will look up Laura Story as well. Sounds like a great artist!
Well said. At the end of the day, isn’t church music merely a species of entertainment, such that if it were not of the trending style of the moment, few attend services? Isn’t it just one more good consumed by the contemporary parishioner within the broader context of modern economic life?
I think you are right to a degree, but I do not think it’s that clean cut. And I think that is why it’s so dangerous. Music in the church is and should be a very sincere, deep way to communicate to God. Music can say so much more than mere words can. But at the same time, for some people, it is an opiate (experience) masquerading as sincere conversation (relation). God is a sounding board more than a person.
Yes, a church like Hillsong may decrease attendance if they stopped their music stuff, but most churches can get past trends. The bottom line is the church is greater than any trend. It will last. However, there are many parishioners holding on to trends, but this is nothing new. Some skip around churches to find it, and others just let their church dictate what the next trend is. And trends aren’t bad in and of themselves, but when they become trendy (doing things because its the cool thing to do) is when it gets messy.
Hope that helps clarify.
first off- I’m excited about stumbling upon this blogsite! Can’t wait to dig through previous posts from all the authors!
I whole-heartedly agree that our society seeks experience over intimacy!! So true!
As I read your post, 1 Corinthians 1:19-23 came to mind. “Though I am free and belong to no one, I have made myself a slave to everyone, to win as many as possible. 20 To the Jews I became like a Jew, to win the Jews. To those under the law I became like one under the law (though I myself am not under the law), so as to win those under the law. 21 To those not having the law I became like one not having the law (though I am not free from God’s law but am under Christ’s law), so as to win those not having the law. 22 To the weak I became weak, to win the weak. I have become all things to all people so that by all possible means I might save some. 23 I do all this for the sake of the gospel, that I may share in its blessings.”
There was a period of 2 years when I stopped leading worship really. I can worship to most any songs.. So I didn’t understand why choosing worship sets had become so complicated. I enjoyed worshipping by myself- but became so anxious when it came to choosing songs others would know and feel comfortable singing.
Now, here I am…and I’m leading worship again- but I find that sometimes I have to scratch a few songs I really want to sing because I feel led to go in another way…
The worship music industry is one I will not pretend to understand… but I’m realizing that as much as worship is a dialogue with Christ- it’s also a conversation in which new friends are eavesdropping. So that’s why this verse came to mind.
There are many themes in the Bible that are repeated throughout. So maybe these repetitive songs are necessary for bringing new friends into this dialogue!?