In the August 2012 edition of Vogue, Pamela Paul wrote an article on a woman’s choice to never become pregnant. She tells the story of a young woman who, from the age of 20 to 25, tried to have tubal ligation. She saw five doctors and all of them refused.
“You’re too young.”
“I thought the same thing at your age.”
“You haven’t found the right man yet.”
These were all common answers to her request. As Paul noted, this woman’s desire to “get her tubes tied” is becoming a more common reality in our culture.
I know something of this reality.
I am married to a woman who has voiced her desire to never have children. Whenever she has expressed this to friends or family there is a look of shock, almost as if she was an alien.
“As a woman, that is what God designed you to be — a mother,” she has been told.
Once she was even told that she cannot be considered a complete woman if she never has children.
Paul raised the issue of the right to choose. But, at least in our Christian circle, we have unearthed a much deeper issue: What does it mean to be a woman?
I will leave that question to one of the woman writers on this blog. But here I am as a man married to a woman who does not want to have children. My wife lucked out, because, as of now, I have no desire for children either. In our community, this has put us on rocky ground.
We live in the south and grew up in a southern Baptist church. We have been told from Day 1 that you grow up, get a degree, get married, get a job or go to seminary, and have children. This is the norm. This is successful Christian living. We have heard phrases like, “The family is the central core of every society,” and “Be fruitful and multiply” all our lives.
We feel like if we do not have children we are hurting the fabric of society and disobeying God’s most primitive command. It weighs heavy on souls. Some tell us that the desire will come. God will grow it in us. Maybe so. We have no desire for children, but we are open to anything God may reveal to us and realize that our desires may change.
But maybe there is a bigger point here. Maybe God is opening a greater scope of possibilities that people aren’t telling us. While the desire to have children has yet to grow, we have begun to wonder if maybe God is calling us to something different.
We have found we can be fruitful and multiply in different ways. My wife’s aunt and uncle have modeled this. They chose not to have children. They are some of the most giving people I know. If you think not having children is a selfish choice then you haven’t met these people. They did not view their choice to not have children as an excuse to have more possessions or focus on careers. They realized maybe they have been called to be the ones in this world that give support to those already here.
I have come to look at it as like a call to celibacy. It is certain that a married couple who do not have children loose a great joy and life-fulfilling relationship. But they gain from it as well — and its not freedom or a selfish lifestyle. They gain the honor and responsibility to have a laser-like focus on bringing holiness to those who are already here. My wife and I have not escaped responsibility — that is not possible with our God. But it is quite possible that we are called to take on a different responsibility. I believe we have a greater responsibility than those who have children to care for the world around us.
You see Paul got it wrong in her article. Not having children is not in essence an issue of the right to choose. And the tradition my wife and I grew up in might have it wrong, too. This is not an issue of what it means to be a woman, man, or married couple. The issue is neither about our will nor our identity. To me, both our will and identity is defined by how we respond to God and those around us. By not having children, we may have a greater impact on the lives that we can immediately touch. For us, that may be our best response to God and others.
_________
Source: Paul, Pamela. (2012, August).
The Other Right to Choose. Vogue, 122-123.
Image credit: justjared.com/2012/07/16/marion-
cotillard-covers-vogue-august-2012/


Wow. I think you and your wife are beyond gracious in your response to people who tries to dump their opinions about having children on you in a coercive or judgemental way. I know I’d certainly have a somewhat less gracious response to such words. As if anyone could ever be more qualified to define success for you than you. =)
As someone who used to be a Christian and no longer is, I have to say that those sorts of belief-coercions and judgements making being part of a Christian community incredibly unattractive to me.
Benjamin,
Thank you for the comments. My wife and I have learned to be gracious for the sake of the community. We understand that these people in our lives are trying, although in a very crude way, to guide us as well as defend their decisions. The few comments that I mentioned should not outweigh the majority of people who, although do not fully understand our decisions, respect us and support us.
We strive for bringing light to any situation. We hope that our response to people’s well-intended, yet negative comments will help them see kindness in the midst of their judgement. That’s what a community is about – we help each other out. If we were all nice all the time, we would never learn and grow with one another. In this way, it’s no different than growing with your spouse in your marriage. That’s the beauty of the church to me.
Cheers!
Philip, this is a very personal post, and you’ve opened yourself up to a tremendous degree. Thanks for sharing part of the journey you and your wife have been on and are still walking together.
I’m right there with you, in growing up in the South where girls were considered “old maids” if not married by their early 20s, to say nothing of having children. (When I was 24 and going overseas to teach English as an undercover missionary one summer in a closed country, I did get the occasional, “Fine, but don’t you want to get married?” Old habits, especially old thought patterns, die hard.)
Since the Bible only ever calls children blessings, that’s how I’m looking at it in our family–the kids are blessings to us.
HOWEVER, Glenn and I were just talking last night about Mary Slessor (I’m a little fascinated with her at the moment), and I proposed that she would not have been as effective had she been married. “So, you think unmarried people can have a wider, greater ministry, potentially?” Glenn asked, or something like that. And, you know, I think they can, in certain circumstances. Granny Brand, the plucky English mother of ground-breaking leprosy researcher/doctor Paul Brand, who was widowed early, spent a great portion of her adult life on horseback in the mountains of India, ministering to the villages there. Had her husband still been living at the time, I doubt she would have embraced such a wide, selfless ministry as she did. So, there are just two examples of unmarried persons leading very effective ministries, ministries that would have by necessity been curtailed to a point had they been married at the time.
On the other hand, this very ministry that Breakfast Reading is a part of is built around a married couple ministering together, jointly speaking, jointly writing, jointly sharing the stage. Theirs is a different ministry from Mary Slessor’s and Granny Brand’s.
And then the point in your post–what about the
couples who are childless, voluntarily or involuntarily? Can there not be ministries, avenues for serving, that might otherwise be closed to them? I can tell you right now about a couple I know–I’m related to–who do not have children and have been married for 15 years. They are following God in a rather unusual plan for their lives at present, a plan that includes childlessness. But, my! The opportunites for service they have! And they take them! They are always open, making themselves available, for leading the worship part of chapels at Christian camps during the summer and beyond, for speaking in conferences and Sunday Schools and churches. They have served God through ministry in Singapore, Turkey, and Papua New Guinea, to say nothing of Canada and the US! They are available in a way that Glenn and I just can’t be, not with 4 kids ages 8 & under. They love it; God is blessing them in their wholehearted obedience; we love watching them do what they love for the One they love.
And they don’t have kids. More…they don’t have the desire for kids, either. And God is using them, blessing them, and getting them into places and ministries left & right.
So, I believe God when he calls children blessings, but I can see that this particular blessing is not for every couple. Just as the blessings unique to a God-centred, childless couple are not for given to every couple.
Thanks for writing about this, Philip.
Good thoughts, Susan! The couple you mentioned is a great example of how there are just some things that are near impossible for married people with kids to do. I can uproot my wife and I easier than my brother, who has a wife and three kids (fourth on the way), can. I have that “luxury”, but it gets difficult because with more “luxury” comes more responsibility.
I echo Susan…you’ve shared a lot here. It’s humbling that you’ve shared this.
And it’s ironic to ponder your words just days after hearing a gray-haired Christian lament following the advice of his mentors to have few children in order to have a greater ministry. You’ve certainly given me more to ponder on the topic he raised. I’ve never really thought through either angle. Thank you!
Both your words and his remind me that I should offer no advice in this area unless asked.
I really relate to this, Phillip.
It wasn’t until the middle of college that I even took seriously the possibility that God would want me to have kids. I turned down the interest of several Christian men who were very into the idea of being dads to a troop (and they were guys I really wanted to be with; it was hard for me). I was open to what God wanted but knew it wasn’t the “troop,” although I did pray for clarity and prayed that God might bring me a guy who wanted to do a lot of the caretaking if that were the case (so that we could both pursue the other things on our hearts). And I still didn’t really want any. The only reasons I could think of for wanting kids were purely selfish ones–to experience certain bonds, etc. In terms of what God had shown me for my life, they really didn’t make sense. I always felt like the command to be fruitful could have a spectrum of applications, and I always believed I was to marry.
It took me a while to realize just how incriminating my p.o.v. was in the church. Even women with vibrant professional careers or in ministry whom I thought might understand often repelled me as soon as I let my feelings be known on the topic. They assumed that I was particularly challenged in my psychological makeup, that I was remarkably immature, and even that I had lesbian tendencies and wouldn’t let me near enough to prove them wrong on any count. In a way, I do understand their response b/c I have known men and women whose predilections for one path or another have been rooted in a real lack of knowing themselves, immaturity, and lack of surrender and responsibility to God’s will. And this has included women who wanted to take on the world but not kids. So it’s not like it can never be a sign of a lack of comfort in one’s gender or what have you. But the church culture worships at the altar of family to the point where they often can’t see and make assumptions about the men and women who don’t fit their worship.
Now as for me personally, debilitating illness has crippled me for all of my adult life (14 years). I still hope very much to marry although I am now grieving the loss of the possibility of ever knowing a youthful love. And I am certainly puzzled as to why God hasn’t allowed me to start on some of the ministry paths that He’d shown me since I was a girl. What a waste of years, it seems! But I am quite relieved that God had always given me some clarity on the issue of children, as now it is patently obvious to me that I never should have children even if I were fully healed tomorrow (for raising them this late in the game would completely obliterate the possibility of doing most of the other things He’s called me to). I think it was His gift to me so that the many pains of illness would not be multiplied by grieving the lack of children. I still desire spiritual children all the more than before and am more sure than ever that my focus will need to be on those.
Deb
Thanks for sharing this part of your journey so well. I find you and your wife very life-giving to me and my family. I certainly don’t need you to have kids in order to minister to me spiritually. You have connected with and encouraged my kids and grandkids on a deep level. (A year later, 4 year old Ben still asks when he will see you again when he sees your picture!)So, – just wanted to encourage you on your present journey/calling!
Robin
Thanks, Robin – we love the Moore family. And, yes, Ben! That guy is awesome. Say hello to the family for me.
I have always loved being around kids and thought that someday I would have at least a couple. When I met the man that would become my husband, I discovered that he had no desire to have kids. Even though we didn’t initially agree on the “kid question,” I realized that God didn’t cause me to love this man so he could father my children; God brought my husband into my life to mold me into the image of Christ–really, the ol’ “happiness vs. holiness” teaching.
However, early in our marriage, I would vacillate between wanting to be a mother and surrendering to the childless life God had given us at that time. I was able to finally be at peace with not having children and have enjoyed the closeness and intimacy that Chris and I have developed along with the journey that God has lead me on. We have determined that although being parents isn’t God’s will, being a good aunt and uncle IS, and we enjoy investing our hearts and souls into our niece and two nephews.
But at the risk of sounding a little selfish, I wish churches would offer better support to those couples who are childless–for whatever reason. I am grateful for those ministries that offer support for infertile couples and those seeking to adopt, but what about those of us who would like Bible studies and classes that don’t center on FAMILIES ONLY? By profession, I have worked with children and teenagers for many years, so “talking shop” about kids is something I’m accustomed to; but my husband has virtually nothing to contribute when the discussion turns to childrearing and such and becomes very uncomfortable.
Consequently, we are very leery of joining a “Sunday School class” or its equivalent because most of the offerings are geared to families. Plus, we’ve experienced the “when are you going to have kids?” question way too often during those initial “get to know you” conversations Christians have during “coffee hour” and other downtimes between church service and Sunday school. I’m sorry, but it’s none of your business about our “family planning” because I’ve only know you for FIVE MINUTES!!! And both of our PARENTS haven’t even asked us that question for many years, and they (obviously) know us REALLY well.
If we say that the only way to become “complete” is through marrying and/or bearing a child, then we have many “incomplete” Christians who made quite a difference for the kingdom.
I guess my God has a lot more power to work through anyone who’s surrendered to Him than you think He is.
Philip, I strongly empathize with this and desired to be child-free forever. So many people resisted it and tried to persuade us out of it some even claiming we were resisting God’s best for our lives. Gotta live the co-dependency posing as godliness.
And it doesn’t stop there. Once you have one, people want to know why you don’t have more. And saying “for ministry’s sake” seems cometely off the radar. We’ve nearly created an idolatry with kids in evangelical circles that goes unexamined. We’re not even sure what “blessing” means when it comes to the bible’s use of the word toward children.
I appreciate your article and hope it goes viral.
For those interested, we had a similar discussion on MyFaithHurdle: http://soulation.org/MyFaithHurdle/?p=112&cpage=2#comments
“We’ve nearly created an idolatry with kids in evangelical circles that goes unexamined. We’re not even sure what “blessing” means when it comes to the bible’s use of the word toward children.”
Thanks for those words, Dale – that sums up what I’m feeling at the moment. While my husband and I want kids, we’re not aggressively pursuing them. This has confused my parents and other well-meaning individuals in our lives, who can’t understand why we don’t want to undergo fertility treatments or leap into the very expensive emotional roller-coaster that is adoption.
And thank you to Phillip, for writing this article – I struggle with thoughts about not feeling “womanly” enough because I don’t have children, or a strong desire for children. Your words and thoughts are helpful. It’s very much needed during this time in my life when several of my friends are pregnant and I’m not.
An article that needs to be read far more widely..
Not to be nit-picky, but “loose” was used in the second to last paragraph, when I believe you meant “lose.”
Again, I loved the article!
-Cody
Hi Pamela,
Wow. After reading your article, I felt so encouraged and empowered to surrender to whatever God has for me, not just what I expected Him to give to me. I especially love how you put the “laser like focus” on giving back to others as a benefit and alternative to what many call the traditional God honoring life with children.
I think you hit it right on. There are indeed many children who need people like yourself and your husband to pour into their lives. Shoot, I’m one of them;-) I find it really sad when people like myself can’t find true and authentic family within the family of God, because people don’t really care to take the time to invest. Most feel like if you’re not blood related, then they’re not willing to commit to make a real investment. This sucks for those of us who don’t have close connection within our family of origin. I think it makes the heart of God as as well. I personally think that family is, as family does. So having a laser like focus on giving and making yourself available to others sound very biblical to me.
This is why I love the perspective of you and your husband. I think you guys are totally right on again with being open to what God may or may not bring. Because really, who gives children in the first place? Do they not all come from the Lord? So then, if you don’t have them, could it be that He hasn’t chosen that for you? Which concludes that maybe in fact you didn’t chose, but God did. Just a thought. Whatever the case, I love that you took the time to write this article. Thank you for that.
Blessing to you and your husband!
Teresa
P.S. I’m not against having children. I hope to have some of my own one day. At least that what I say as a single young woman. Who knows how I’ll feel once I get married. Like you, I’m open to whatever God may or may not have for me;-)
I really enjoyed reading this! Very thought provoking stuff!
I believe as long as you are “multiplying” by making disciples- you are fulfilling the great commission!! That’s what we’re here for right?
Also, I just want to encourage you to not feel pressured by our culture. As I type several scenarios are running through my mind of people who have children for selfish reasons- or make idols out of them… etc. So whenever you find people preaching their opinions at you- just be reminded that God knows your heart in the matter- and He’s the only one you need concern yourself with.
Philip,
I appreciate your shout-out to my blog on womanhood. And I appreciate your boldness to publicly explain where you and S are at about children.
I hope I can be a voice of kind dissent about a few things you wrote.
(Edits below: I realized I was being too assuming in this comment the first time I posted, so I’ve tried to make it clearer and less assume-y–is that a word?, more sharing my personal experience… I hope you’ll take this updated comment as the one I wish I had posted first)
First, you do have friends who have been both understanding and supporting of your decision to not have children. I know when your wife first told me I was neither shocked nor judgmental. I believe there are good reasons to avoid children.
That said, this statement “I believe we have a greater responsibility than those who have children to care for the world around us,” made me catch myself. It sounded like you were inserting a hierarchy of values to make childlessness more difficult (maybe more godly?) than having children? Maybe you did not mean that and I’ve misunderstood you. Perhaps it would help me if you could explain what you meant by it. That childless couples are more responsible to this world? Or maybe they have to keep a sharp look out more vigilantly?
I know childless couples I admire and appreciate for their choice. However, I want to be a challenge to you and your wife that any time a couple choose (not have infertility poured on them) to divide making love from procreation they are making a huge step that affects the community and so the community who care about you want to understand (if they love you!).
I am not against birth control and I’m not against childlessness. I am for caution.
You may have sought therapy and lots of counsel. That’s great!
For me, I took the childlessness route to protect me from the chaotic-looking overhaul of invasion a child brings. I didn’t want the craziness of children I wanted to look for the ways to impact the kingdom of God and plan and budget for them than have the wild card grow slowly in my womb and swoop into my life.
I do not want to assume that’s what you and your wife are doing, but I share it as another possibility for others reading.
I am convinced it is easy to try to be exceptional and not have children because it’s the road not taken. It’s the cool way to be totally sacrificial that I took for 10 years.
I know it attracted me as a martyr-type, one who wanted to do ALL I could for the gospel.
And while doing the right thing (remaining childless) may be good, doing it for the wrong reason is not.
Jonalyn,
As always, thanks for your input. You always have a way of getting to the hard of the matter with your questions, which is a great, Jesus-like quality. Let me see if I can clarify.
“I believe we have a greater responsibility than those who have children to care for the world around us,” was not attended to make a hierarchy of values. “Greater” was probably a bad choice. I was trying to highlight how childless people, in general, have greater freedom, which means greater responsibility (greater in the sense of quantity, and not quality). The focus of that statement is the second half: its a greater responsibility towards people outside of their household. I think it is safe to say that childless couples have the opportunity to invest in others outside of their household more than people with children. And I took it a step further by saying that we do not just have a greater opportunity but the responsibility to do so – to whom much is given, much is required.
I was not trying to make me feel important or like a martyr either. I think that whole mindset and language should be thrown out in this topic of children.
Hope that clarifies some stuff.
Philip,
That helps a lot! Thank you for clarifying.
Grateful for your thoughts on this,
Jonalyn
Philip,
Have you seen this article? http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/are-all-women-born-to-be-mothers/2012/08/31/b5df2f0e-f2b1-11e1-adc6-87dfa8eff430_story.html
Interesting secular viewpoint, written by the founder of Feministing no less… and check out the book she just wrote (at the end).
This was an illuminating quote:
“A 2010 Pew Research Center study showed that the rate of American women who did not have children almost doubled since 1976. That’s nearly one in five women today.”
And one more on how some times call for women to not have children: http://elizabethchapin.wordpress.com/2012/05/15/mothers-day-and-the-hunger-games/
Thanks for the shout out to my thoughts on motherhood. This is a very important topic for our times as parenthood and marriage rights are both hot topics.
As a single early-30s woman, I want children but am trying to come to terms with the fact that I might not get the chance. I struggle not only with that potential loss, but also with being considered less than a woman in the eyes of the Church if I never become a mother. I desperately need messages like this. Thank you.
Another interesting article on this topic from 2004 was referenced on Facebook today and strongly links civil marriage rights with procreation. (http://tech.mit.edu/V124/N5/kolasinski.5c.html) The author poses that linking marriage rights to procreation is necessary for the normal and healthy functioning of society. But, we are called to imagine and enact an alternative society where such choices as remaining childless are not only healthy options, they can be procreative in a different way – a way of making room for the inbreaking Kingdom of God. Some who choose to remain childless may do so in order to participate in different ways to give birth to a new society.
This is such a good and different perspective compared to an article I just read on how having a child can feel like it’s weakening a marriage: http://www.rolereboot.org/family/details/2012-09-is-the-secret-to-a-good-marriage-not-having-children
An idea that I think most couples with children feel like, from time to time.
Wow Philip,
This is quite an interesting topic. A few things I would like to say:
1) Do you think that the church is just as guilty as the secular world for defining a woman by her body? In the secular worldview its about looks, in the church it is about virginity and motherhood? And why is it strange if a woman chooses not to have a child but not considered weird for a man? Do not men have an urge deep within them as well to reproduce? Is it not as strong?
2) When I listen to arguments against gay marriage, I continually hear that such marriages can’t produce fruit i.e. children because one of the purposes of marriage is to procreate. How do you argue for heterosexual marriage if childbearing and rearing suddenly do not have such an important place? (not sure if I phrased this question right…still grasping for what I want to ask but here it is)
And lastly, assuming the writer of this piece is of white racial origin, are you concerned about the future of your racial group. BBC article, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-18100457 speaks about the declining birth rates among the white population. At some primal level, we have children to carry on our genes, to ensure survival of a particular culture, values, etc.?
Not too sure if I said everything clearly but here you are.
Esther,
These are excellent questions! Let me see if I can answer your comments without diving into topics worthy of whole other posts. Please undertand that I am a man being asked to answer questions about women that I feel are really hard to answer since I am not a woman. If my answers are unsatisfactory, I encourage you to talk to Jonalyn about these questions.
1) The Church has done its fair share of defining women by their bodies. There is nothing wrong with that until you start to tell women that they are not true women until motherhood. I think it’s dangerous to define a person by what they can potentially become (whether physically or relationally, which motherhood is both). A great woman makes a great mother, not the other way around.
Men do seem to get off easier inside and outside the Church. I think there are many reasons for this. Some of it is what I mentioned above in defining a woman by her potential instead of who she is. Part of it has to do with the culture and the history. Traditionally, a woman’s role in society is all wound up in having and nurturing children. Men, traditionally, do their deed and then go back to work. I know this is a crude generalization, but I think it has its part in all of this. I could be wrong. But it is very complicated and deep seeded, and needs a more focused place to discuss it than these comments.
As a whole, men do have urges to have children. I have no idea if it is a strong as a woman’s or not. I think women are more about it because of the things mentioned above. That seems to be changing though. But you can see that the majority of these comments are women. The post was not written to women specifically. It seems women have a deeper care about this subject than men.
2) The gay marriage argument is designed to show that type of union as unnatural. The unnatural part is not that a child should be produced, but the fact that there is no way for a child to be produced. It’s trying to reinforce the man and woman aspect and not the necessity for a child to com out of marriage. Although, as seen by your take on it, it can come off as much more strict than I think is intended.
Some mentors of ours when we were engaged told us something I will never forget: “Children are a welcome addition, but they are not your marriage.” I did not get married to have children. They are a plus but not a necessity. I think the lack of clear separation here leads to a lot of broken marriages.
3) I am caucasian. But I am not ascribing childlessness to everyone, only a few. Plus I believe I can also further my culture and extend its legacy outside of merely procreating.
Esther, I hope these answers help!
PK
Hey Phillip,
I think this was a missing work here: “The Church has done its fair share of defining women by their bodies. There is nothing wrong with that until …”
because I’m fairly sure you do think it is wrong for the Church to define women by their bodies?
Correct me if I’m mistaken.
Jonalyn,
I do not think it is wrong to partly define a person, whether male or female, by their bodies. I do not think that is the end all, but our bodies do play a role in defining who we are (again not wholly, but it has its part in the conversation). My point was that we should not define ourselves by what our bodies can potentially become or do (such as childbearing/motherhood). I think it is unhealthy to say a woman is not a woman until she has kids. It’s as unhealthy as saying a man does not become a man until he procreates. But it is okay to say a man is a man partly because of his body – that is one of the main defining characteristics.
What if the person is a hermaphrodite or transgender? How would they begin to define or identify themselves given the bodies they are in?
Oops didn’t finish.
In the church what I’ve heard is that you are what you are based on the sex you were born with. That psychologically or spiritually something must be wrong if you identify with a sex that you weren’t born with.
Philip,
This is super interesting. I would say it’s always wrong to define or identify a person solely with or by their body. I’m not sure what “partly define” means.
Are you saying our body plays a part in defining who we are, but is never sufficient? If so, I agree. Do you think our bodies are necessary for defining who we are?
I agree with you that our potentials as humans cannot be permitted to define our value. I don’t believe in functionalism either.
That said, do you think a couple who does not have children have lost anything? should grieve anything? If so, I’d love to know what, specifically.
“Are you saying our body plays a part in defining who we are, but is never sufficient? If so, I agree.” – Yes that is my point. Thus why I said it can not wholly define us but should play a role.
Also I think it is difficult to say a childless couple has lost something given they never had it in the first place. But as I originally said in the post the miss out on something unique and special. What that is exactly seems to depend on the person (and probably requires some experience that I do not have), but I have not met someone who said a child was anything but a blessing.
Thank you for being so open about this. The decision to be childless, or not; married, or not speaks to God’s beautiful and deliberate diversity. Dale wrote in an earlier post that the evangelical community seems to have created idols out of children, and of the family as well I would add. My life experience as a Christian has been nothing even close to traditional and I often feel like I am swimming upstream, but God has His hook in me and I do not doubt His plan or lament thus journey.