I am one of those women who loves talking about women’s particular problems in life from balancing work and family to the beauty myth.
Zora Neale Hurston in her 1937 novel, Their Eyes Were Watching God, fashioned a memorable picture of a problem.
“De nigger woman is de mule uh de world so fur as Ah can see . . . ‘worked tuh death,” “ruint wid mistreatment,” yet strong enough to carry impossible “loads” nobody else wants to “tote.”
Pointing out problems and solutions is dangerous work.
Dangerous to friendships and established structures of hierarchy. Perhaps this is why so many anti-feminists try to count their blessings. If we have nothing to complain over, nothing to fix except our ingratitude, then the problem can be easily solved.
I used to think that way.
I’m very good at counting my blessings.
~
This week my husband forwarded, “Patriarchy Shmatriarchy” written by GirlWritesWhat at The Good Men Project. The author, a pessimistic divorced mother of three writes “to convince anyone who’ll listen to start thinking of men as human beings, and start insisting women collectively grow up.” 
She believes women use men like tools. ”While a man used a scythe to get grain, the tool a woman used to get grain was…well, a man. While a man used a spear to defend his home from invaders, the weapon a woman used was–yup, you guessed it–a man.
Women, even feminists, “still seem perfectly fine enforcing male gender characteristics that are of benefit to them–utility, self-sacrifice, disposability and resource acquisition–and feminists don’t seem that interested in changing this. In the advancement of women’s interests, they’ve dismantled most of the benefits men enjoyed under patriarchy, while leaving the costs and responsibilities untouched.”
In other worlds, feminism hasn’t been good to men. GirlsWritesThat thinks the arrangement is great, so we should be glad for it. Keep on using men and stop complaining.
Count our blessings.
I disagree, anytime we use an ideology to oppress each other (patriarchy or feminism) we’re failing to be appropriately human. We’re also failing in the Golden Rule.
What stood out to me from GirlWritesWhat is her point that even within patriarchy women have rarely slunk down in submissive fashion. Even (especially?) the most submissive of wives knows how to manipulate her husband to get what she wants. I’m not saying she DOES, I’m saying she KNOWS HOW.
But our real lives don’t show either men or women completely dominating. Men are not just tools in the hand of women. Women are not simply sitting inside embroidering pillowcases while the men sweat to bring in food and haul water. Home is not a castle, and then workplace is not a labor camp.
In 2012 millions of women are still the ones who draw water for their homes, on their shoulders, on their heads, toting the weight miles.
Women are still the mules of the world. And then, again, so are men. The important question: are we willing mules? Do we want to be mules?
Out of my quiet home into the hot yard I walked to interview all the males on the job site today.
They didn’t sound like mules. They all commented on liking the back-breaking, heat-searing, tangible, physical work. One excavator called it “honest.” Each shook their heads over the idea of an air-conditioned office. Why weren’t more women out there with them?
They didn’t know. But they didn’t feel pressured to provide for a woman or family. Most of them were single.
~
My husband often says, “Feminism revealed the crisis of masculinity, it didn’t create it.”
The crisis: men don’t know what it means to be male. And in the same vein, neither do women. Because we’re grasping for a role we define in contrast or in disdain of each other. You are not more of a man because you lead a woman. You are not more of a woman because you’ve caught a man.
You are not more of a man because you use women like tools. It’s childish thinking to think women cannot lead.
You are not more of a woman because you use men like tools. It’s childish thinking to think men have to be trained.
Our disdain is thick and disguised.
For the men I know, many of them are taken more seriously outside the home: the workplace, the church, the government. And in these realms, men aren’t sure how a woman, even more a mother of young children, can contribute.
The solution isn’t taking patriarchy or feminism as a battering ram for our just rewards. Nor is it giving up and just hauling more water.
How do we learn to take the opposite sex more seriously, instead of using them for our ends?





“Our disdain is thick and disguised.” Powerful words, Jonalyn. We fool ourselves more often than we know when it comes to how we view and treat others. I pray that God will open my eyes to see others as he sees them: the way they really are (made in his image) and for the value they really have (worth every bit of the sacrifice on the cross). Feminism, patriarchism, whatever-isms; none of them capture what people truly are, do they?
Tim
P.S. New guest post at Kim Kirby’s place (linked through my name). Hope you get a chance to take a look!
Thank you for your reflective words, Tim.
Always glad to hear of where your writing is landing, too!
Hi Jonalyn,
It’s nice to see that you are using literature by/about black women in your post–The Help(although written by a black woman) and this book by Zora Neale Hurston, which I absolutely love.
This isn’t related to the post but I think it would be interested if you investigated femininity through a black woman’s eyes. Although I cannot speak for all black woman, I think it would be interesting to understand how black women within North America define femininity as they face social constructs, stereotypes etc. How do they struggle with defining femininity? What does it mean to them? Does it differ from their white counter parts? What challenges do they face? How do they flesh it out?
And how does it apply to those who are Christian? Christian and attend multiethnic churches or churches that are predominantly white? What is their experience?
Anyway just some rambling thoughts. Enjoyed the above post.
Esther,
I really appreciate your thoughts. In fact, I was hoping to do a blog discussing The Help with a black friend of mine. But she wasn’t able to get the book from her library.
Perhaps you and I could do a discussion on these very questions for an upcoming post? We could share our mutual perspectives, African American and Hispanic.
If this sounds fun, email me at jonalyn at soulation dot org
Hi Jonalyn,
I shall send you an email.
“It’s childish thinking to think men have to be trained.”
Amen to that. I am so tired of people asking me if I have my husband “trained yet.” My usual response is that he is the one who is training me, as I am lazier and messier.
What is interesting to me is that I most often hear about the need to train our husbands from women who default to their husbands to make all the decisions and act as the leader, yet they want to train them in how to lead/act/behave. What is your take on that?
As for your question, how do we learn to take the opposite sex more seriously, I think we can do that by giving up our assumptions when interacting with each other. Giving up assumptions requires giving up control. Why would a woman want to train a man? For control. Likewise, a man would want to dominate a woman for control. And giving up control means admitting you don’t have all the answers.
Sophie,
Fantastic point: the women who “train’ their husbands also train them to be the “Christian” leader the way they think best. “Lead me the way I’m telling you, darn it!”
Of course this isn’t always the case, but often it is. I believe this is due to the insane pressure from pulpits for men to be the spiritual leader/head. Women are afraid their husband is failing them, failing their kids, failing God if they don’t make final decisions, if they don’t lead family devotions, etc. At core the fear mongers make women think that if their husband isn’t doing it “right” then their kids will be gay.
It’s crazy thinking, but it sells well.
Great idea: “give up your assumptions” when you meet a new man or woman. This forces you to admit you don’t have control or a box to put this new person into, you don’t have a lid to smash down, you don’t have a label to slap on.
I respect and help my husband. I talk to my Father about my husband, asking Him to show me how to best love my husband. He answers and I follow through. It’s simple really.
I think to often we over-think. I instead keep lines of communication wide open between my heavenly Father, and my husband.
In our home, all is well, peaceful and calm. Perfect? Ha, no. But peaceful, we all like being here.
This is how I know.
Lisa,
Your home of respect and help (which I’m assuming is mutual between your husband and you) sounds like a good place of peace.
I would, however, challenge you to consider that many men and women are not able to respect and help each other in this way. My post is pointing out the power struggles that exist due to our fear or failing that we are losing power. How do we learn to be less afraid?
I believe thinking more, not less is the solution to re-learning these harmful ways of interacting with the opposite sex. For instance, if we’ve been raised to experienced men as power hungry we will not simply stop being afraid of men by respecting them. Does that makes sense?
We need to think through where we learned to believe men are power mongers, we need to think and pray and seek professional therapy and spiritual guidance to learn new ways to engage with men. This will require much thinking and not one simple formula.
This post where I explain how men and women’s animosity increases based on their environment may give you a way to step into another person’s shoes. http://soulation.org/jonalynblog/2008/04/how-harsh-environments-hurt-men-and-women.html
I’d love to know what you think in response!