A woman was wearing black sweatpants in the parking lot. My son and I had just finished swimming when we passed her.
My eyes rested for a moment on the ‘Love Pink’ on her bum.
It has nothing to do with the color. But I don’t ‘Love Pink.’
Victoria’s Secret campaign to sexify something as slouchy as sweat pants with a two word slogan is brilliant. Women wear ‘Love Pink’ because it identifies themselves with something we all want.
Desire-ability. Buying lingerie or even sweatpants at a lingerie store proves that we believe we have sex appeal and that automatically means “Worth.” Sexy women are empowered women, right?
Some thought I meant that in my modesty post (Covering Up is Not the Answer). Actually, I believe confident women are sexy and this makes them empowered. But you can get sexy without the power or the confidence.
Victoria Secret has shown us the way. ‘Love Pink’ says, “Don’t judge me by my sleepwear, because I’m sexy underneath.”
Doesn’t matter if I’m wearing briefs up to my belly button or a red silk thong, the words “Love Pink” mean I am in charge, that I can flirt with you on my terms.
And what girl doesn’t want to be known for some little bit of seductive power?
I won’t pretend that it’s not enticing. All you have to do is slap down $30 to buy in. And if you wear the uniform, men are bound to notice.
This is cheap sex appeal. Don’t hear me wrong, the women aren’t cheap. The uniform is.
Their sex appeal is cheaply bought.
It takes a more than buying ‘Love Pink’ to have sustainable sex appeal.
I’m in the middle of watching Magic Mike right now and finding myself feeling something similar. The dancing isn’t bad, but it’s not quite what I had hoped for. Honestly, it doesn’t ring my bell.
Even my husband thought Channing Tatum was an excellent dancer. Sure, he dances pretty well. But, well, he’s not the guy I want to make love to.
Have my capacities to become turned on dulled with motherhood?
I don’t think so.
I believe my capacity to be turned on has focused into wanting something more than tittilating abs and gyrating hips. In fact, even a guy with a tighter body than my husband’s can’t get me turned on because I don’t want that stripper.
As I watch, I find the men and their outfits rather unusual, creative. But it’s mostly like observing a mating dance. It’s entertaining, but it doesn’t make me want these guys.
These male strippers are not, contrary to Matthew McConaughey’s line “The husband I never had . . . the dreamboat guy that never came along.”
Now, if my husband were dancing like that?
Okay, sure. But not these guys.
The strippers in Magic Mike are, in one small way, like the women who wear ‘Love Pink’: they’re begging me to reduce their humanity to sexiness. And that is not sexy, at least not to me.
Even Magic Mike helps us see he has more dreams than women, booze and a good time.
Mike wants to create one-of-a-kind furniture instead of fantasies.
And that woman in the parking lot, I know, has dreams beyond being sexy and desirable.
Sexiness is actually pretty elusive, it comes as a by-product of something else. I would love for you to join me in cleaving apart the unnatural connection between sexy and desire-able. In other words, I can desire a person without thinking them sexy. And, you can be sexy without being desirable. You can want to ‘do it’ with someone out of anger, dominance, disgust, revenge, bitterness, power, domination, etc. I believe this list is part of the inspiration for the ‘F’ word.
But most young women have bought the lie that to not sexy = not worthy. For a man to say, “You’re not sexy to me,” feels insulting to most women, even though it would be the most appropriate response of a father for his daughter or a brother for his sister. Most of us would feel demoted maybe even discarded.
But being merely sexy is also synonymous with being discardable (you look, you lust, you $%#*, you’re done). So we’ve got a lose-lose situation panning out here. Sexy is not enough, not by half.
And this is why I don’t ‘Love Pink’.
When I’m in public places, if I come across as sexy I want it to be a by-product of something else, say my intelligence or my boldness or my enthusiasm. I want sexy to be a sparkle, but not the whole show.
I hunt to find clothes that make my sex appeal limited to glimmers. And I’d ask the same of every woman or man around me. Let me be surprised by your sexuality, don’t brand it on your butt and breasts.
Let me notice your sexuality as part of the marbled goodness in your humanity. Let me stop in my tracks when I see your beauty because I didn’t see it when you first walked in the door.
Don’t guide me to imagine what you wear underneath.





“Now, if my husband were dancing like that? Okay, sure. But not these guys.”
Ha! If I danced like that for my wife she’d probably start laughing. Then she’d call a couple friends and laugh some more. She’d probably tell her family about it at Thanksgiving dinner next week, laughing still. I wouldn’t blame her a bit. I’ve seen me dance.
Well, as they said in Magic Mike, ANYONE can learn.
Yeah, but I tend to look like this guy, or more properly I tend to look like the people who end up dancing with him! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zlfKdbWwruY
LOL
Women want to feel and look sexy. Lacy bits and push up bras help you feel sexy. Have you ever had that feeling? Being smart doesn’t really give you that feeling of seduction. Confidence, maybe. Maybe your intelligence makes someone think you are sexy but are you feeling sexy?
And maybe that is what VS is selling, a feeling.
I think that sexy feeling is different for everyone. It’s too much of a generalization to say that lacy underwear makes women feel sexy but being intelligent doesn’t. In my own experience, when I achieve something that takes strategic thinking and boldness, like beating my husband at chess, one of the outcomes is that I feel sexy. It’s part of the confidence package that rushes through me during that moment.
VS is selling an experience and a feeling, definitely. But it’s not for everyone, and all too often VS promotes that feeling as all-encompassing of a woman’s worth.
Hi Bridgette,
I don’t agree with VS’s message. I do find their overt sexuality nauseating.
And yes what makes you feel sexy varies from one person to another.
I define or rather view sexy as not just confidence but an embrace, a welcome, a celebration of my sexuality, desires etc. That I am comfortable in this body God has given me whether I am 10 pounds heavier or at my optimum weight. And for me that is very much a body thing.
Being intelligent does not make me feel sexy. I feel confident and competent.
I feel sexy when I take time to enjoy my body. Which means exercise, and spending extra time on my hair, face and skin. And lacy underwear helps in the celebration of my body and my sexuality.
I love this one! Got to share it!
Your challenge at the end there is great.
I read this before lunch yesterday and started up a mini-round-table discussion with a group of women about the topic. It was fun and several of us came to similar conclusions as you…especially the idea that you mentioned of sexiness being elusive and a byproduct of something else. I don’t think that wearing “Love Pink” on my clothing can give off the impression that I’m sexy any more than wearing glasses can force people to think I’m brilliant. Or at least it’s not sustainable and I think I sell myself short if I’m reducing any of my characteristics to a brand. And like the comment above me states…I also really appreciate the challenge at the end.
P.S. Victoria’s Secret always televises an annual fashion show in December. What do you think about that? Possible “I Don’t Love Pink” part 2?
NIce idea for a Part 2. Can you give me some discussion points you’d like to see?
Hmm…some things that come to mind when I think of the fashion show are:
- Lingerie becomes mainstream entertainment
- The lingerie that goes down the runway is often decked-out like a costume; the models almost take on a whole new character. The fashion show is at the other end of the spectrum from the Pink sweatpants…now it’s about the $2.5 million dollar diamond-studded “fantasy bra”
- How does it differ (if it does) from an “outerwear” fashion show? What are they really selling here? Who is the “buyer” and what are they buying into?
- Even just all of the language used by VS is interesting to me: angels, fantasy bras, etc.
great ideas, Martha. I think maybe a #soulchat via @Soulation on Twitter might be good the evening of the VS show. Can you email me the date it will air?
I think the discussion is how you come off to others as sexy.
But for me the older I’ve grown, the less I care about whether other people think I am sexy. Who cares?
I am more interested in how I feel about my body and developing a good attitude towards it. DO you think you are sexy?
The funny thing is when I was younger I was all about the smarts. But now I find equal enjoyment in loving my body and caring for it as I do in developing my mind.
Can we discuss speech? I think I lean toward using sexy speech more than trying to dress sexy.
I am well acquainted with what Proverbs has to say about a woman’s speech. However, if it stands to reason that you find it acceptable to show a glimmer of your sexuality, than what does a glimmer of speech sound like? Can we joke with our good friends about sexual matters? Can we discuss sexual issues with mixed company? Can we use innuendo to make a point?
I’m sure that most of this has to do with heart intentions..Am I trying to attract the opposite sex? Am I trying to shock the “Church Lady” with my ability to talk unashamedly about sex ?
Short answer: yes, your speech needs to accurately reflect your sexiness, neither hiding nor flaunting it, but sharing it as part of the God-given aspect of your humanity. We all share our sexuality, our goal is to share it with holiness. Jesus did (he let Mary anoint and massage his feet).
Long answer: Take a look at the post on Sexy and it’s meanings that I posted below.
After you read, this response will make more sense.
We are all sexual, and we can’t entirely hide our sexual desires, femininity, capacity to be attractive and attracting. I think it is actually impossible to be a human without a sexual element. So it’s not to show or not to show our sexuality, but how do we show it, or better, how do we steward our sexuality.
When I wrote that I want my clothes and posture (and speech) to share my sexiness I meant that I want the clothes, posture, speech I use to accurately communicate who I am. I’m passionate and empathetic, concerned about love and virtue. I know myself as more than sexy, but also not less. I want my clothes, etc to reflect that. I wrote more on that here: http://soulation.org/jonalynblog/2012/10/what-you-wear-shapes-you.html
You wrote:
[For a man to say, “You’re not sexy to me,” feels insulting to most women, even though it would be the most appropriate response of a father for his daughter or a brother for his sister. Most of us would feel demoted maybe even discarded.]
And most importantly, this is even the proper response of a fried to a friend’s wife! But would still feel offensive because I am a sinner.
I’m not sure I agree, since there are men I believe are sexy (by ‘sexy’ here I mean attractive, sexually powerful, sexually charged, delightful), but whom I don’t want to make love to.
There is a difference between finding someone sexy (like when we tell a girlfriend who is about to go out on a date, “you look HOT!”) and wanting to bed them.
To expound on a point you made that demands more explanation: Being sexy=being discardable only if that’s all you’re offering (like “no strings attached” or “I have nothing else to offer so this is a one-night-stand”). My husband finds me incredibly sexy and not in the discardable way. I don’t think the sexy VS is promoting is specifically the discardable kind. I think it’s specifically the sexually empowered kind. It certainly feels empowering to women who don’t/can’t offer anything else, who feel sexually discarded after their one-night-stand. There’s always more lingerie to fuel up for next time.
I’m intrigued by the comments about how intelligence does/doesn’t make different people feel sexy. I think that might be important?
There is such a confusing array of meanings to the word “sexy” that I think this post I wrote a few years ago would help.
http://soulation.org/jonalynblog/2009/10/women-sexy-sexual-feminine.html
Check it out and drag those concepts over here.
I agree with you in that sexiness is more about confidence than it is about the kind of underwear they have on.
I’ve always thought that the sexiest men are the ones who hold their head high, walk with confidence, know where they’re going. Why should it be any different with women?
I go to a school with a lot of girls that wear all manner of ‘I Love Pink’ clothes, and I’ve come to see it as a sorority-esque thing. I think the image it paints is one of being for popular girls, and telling girls my age “If you wear this, you’ll look like a popular girl.” Maybe that psychological manipulation is worse than the statement it encourages.
When I was growing up I covered myself as much as possible for fear of being judged (or worse, ‘noticed’). Though I still sometimes can’t bring myself to show my shoulders in public, I remind myself that not only am I beautiful to myself, I’m beautiful to God. After all, it was God who asked Adam and Eve why they covered themselves with leaves. Almost as if he anticipated the trouble that clothes would pose for women and their feelings of self-worth and wanted our spirits to speak for themselves.
Jonalyn, I love this post! This is the kind of thoughtful, honest writing that keeps me coming back to your blog. I read this post over Thanksgiving break and had to read parts of it out loud to my husband and two friends who were in the room with me. Thank you!
Marta,
I love knowing that. What parts did you read out loud?